As for what OtE said about D/deaf people. I struggle to find anything to disagree with. Why should any of us, with any condition that gives rise to extra needs, be expected to have exactly the same needs as others that are put in roughly the same category?
The level of hearing loss thing I've probably mentioned in the past in relation to my DLA to PIP migration. The ultimate in absurdity. I was turned down and phoned the DWP with my usual preamble about my being deaf so please don't be offended if I ask for something to be repeated.
The explanation? I said I'd served in the forces, and obviously I wouldn't have been able to enlist if I'd been deaf. I asked the call handler whether he'd like to know how many of my colleagues died in the explosion that left me with permanent hearing loss. He still wanted an audiogram, which, as OtE points out, is beside the point, since it's the need for hearing aids that is relevant, not the degree of loss.
I fought it, though. Thanks to people here, over the last 2-3 years in particular, I'm reviewing my life and saying to myself, and increasingly to the world that I have the right to define my impairments/difficulties and the extra needs that arise from them.
I think it was someone here - OtE? Ally? - who mentioned to me NHS accessible information standards. Having discovered they exist, my approach is now to express sympathy to people in the NHS that their systems are rubbish and make it difficult for me to get the help I'm entitled to, but perhaps an easier way for them to help me would be such-and-such. I confess that where they won't help, I've been known to end up in tears. But most do help.
I wish I was instinctively stronger in negotiating. I've been a very late learner, but I'm trying now. I'm realising that we have to fight for what we are entitled to. Keep fighting, Fizz.